Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Standard Relay Corp., Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Universal Relay Corp.
This text of 444 F.2d 1092 (Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Standard Relay Corp., Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Universal Relay Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
170 U.S.P.Q. 435
CUTLER-HAMMER, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
STANDARD RELAY CORP., Defendant-Appellant.
CUTLER-HAMMER, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNIVERSAL RELAY CORP., Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 956, 957, Dockets 71-1115, 71-1116.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued June 29, 1971.
Decided June 29, 1971.
Samuel M. Sprafkin, New York City (Mandel M. Einhorn, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants.
Andrew O. Riteris, Milwaukee, Wis. (Michael, Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, Wis., Herbert C. Earnshaw, Royall, Koegel & Wells, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before MOORE, FEINBERG and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After an extensive non-jury trial in these consolidated actions in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York before Edmund L. Palmieri, J., plaintiff Cutler-Hammer, Inc. was awarded judgment against defendants Standard Relay Corp., and Universal Relay Corp. We have considered appellants' lengthy papers on appeal, as well as their oral argument, but we conclude that we should affirm the judgment on the thorough opinion of judge Palmieri, reported at 328 F.Supp. 868.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 F.2d 1092, 170 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 435, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutler-hammer-inc-v-standard-relay-corp-cutler-hammer-inc-v-ca2-1971.