Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Chicago Telephone Supply Co.

Seventh Circuit

Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Chicago Telephone Supply Co.

103 F.2d 732, 41 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 375, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3651

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 1939

DocketNo. 6685

StatusPublished

This text of 103 F.2d 732 (Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Chicago Telephone Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Chicago Telephone Supply Co., 103 F.2d 732, 41 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 375, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3651 (7th Cir. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves a contest among rival inventors thoroughly discussed in the opinion in case No. - 6682, Globe-Union, Inc., et al. v. Chicago Telephone Supply Company et al., 103 F.2d 722, this day rendered. In the instant case defendants-appellants contend in counterclaim that as between defendants-appellees Chicago Telephone Supply Company and Newton C. Scheilenger and defendants-appellants, the latter have superior rights in respect of the subject matter and they state that if plain[733]*733tiffs-appellants in Case No. 6682 succeed, defendants-appellants’ appeal will not require consideration.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in Case No. 6682 and on authority thereof, the decree appealed from is reversed and this cause is remanded, with directions to proceed in accordance with the views expressed in that opinion.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves a contest among rival inventors thoroughly discussed in the opinion in case No. - 6682, Globe-Union, Inc., et al. v. Chicago Telephone Supply Company et al., 103 F.2d 722, this day rendered. In the instant case defendants-appellants contend in counterclaim that as between defendants-appellees Chicago Telephone Supply Company and Newton C. Scheilenger and defendants-appellants, the latter have superior rights in respect of the subject matter and they state that if plain[733]*733tiffs-appellants in Case No. 6682 succeed, defendants-appellants’ appeal will not require consideration.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in Case No. 6682 and on authority thereof, the decree appealed from is reversed and this cause is remanded, with directions to proceed in accordance with the views expressed in that opinion.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 F.2d 732, 41 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 375, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutler-hammer-inc-v-chicago-telephone-supply-co-ca7-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack