Cutler Creek v. Townhouse Ass'n, Inc. v. Cutler Creek Village Condo. Ass'n, Inc.

584 So. 2d 103, 1991 WL 139148
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 30, 1991
Docket91-1140
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 584 So. 2d 103 (Cutler Creek v. Townhouse Ass'n, Inc. v. Cutler Creek Village Condo. Ass'n, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cutler Creek v. Townhouse Ass'n, Inc. v. Cutler Creek Village Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 584 So. 2d 103, 1991 WL 139148 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

584 So.2d 103 (1991)

CUTLER CREEK VILLAGE TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant,
v.
CUTLER CREEK VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 91-1140.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 30, 1991.
Rehearing Denied September 12, 1991.

Robert C. Eber, for appellant.

Robert E. Dillon, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cutler Creek Village Townhouse Association, Inc., appeals the issuance of a temporary injunction restraining appellant from using security gates to restrict access into certain areas. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.

We find that the injunction is defective in that it fails to comply with Rule 1.610(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires the posting of bond to pay costs and damages which could result from the issuance of a temporary injunction. See Minimatic Components, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 494 So.2d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

However, we also find that appellee adequately complied with all other requirements necessary for the issuance of the temporary injunction. Accordingly, we affirm the issuance of the temporary injunction, *104 but reverse and remand for entry of an appropriate bond.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Gainesville v. Watson Construction Co.
815 So. 2d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Denowitz v. INFORMATION TV NETWORK, INC.
717 So. 2d 1106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Lopez v. Paredes
653 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Medical Facilities Development, Inc. v. Little Arch Creek Properties, Inc.
656 So. 2d 1300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Med. Fac. v. Little Arch Creek Properties
656 So. 2d 1300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Conant v. Armada Key West Ltd. Partnership
610 So. 2d 640 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
584 So. 2d 103, 1991 WL 139148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutler-creek-v-townhouse-assn-inc-v-cutler-creek-village-condo-assn-fladistctapp-1991.