Cutchin v. Hogshire

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2009·No. 09-7747·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7747

HARRY A. CUTCHIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EDWARD HOGSHIRE, Judge, 16th Judicial Circuit Court,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00802-JRS)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry A. Cutchin, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Kugelman, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Harry A. Cutchin appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Cutchin v. Hogshire, No. 3:08-cv-00802-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept. 9,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cutchin v. Hogshire, (4th Cir. 2009).

Cutchin v. Hogshire (Cutchin v. Hogshire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related