Cutbirth v. State

183 S.W. 1198
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cutbirth v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 Tex. Crim. 325
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 16, 1916·No. No. 3937·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, J.

Appellant was convicted of

perjury; his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary. This is a companion case to Reed v. State, 183 S. W. 1168, this day decided, in an opinion by Judge Harper, cause No. 3938. The questions are, it may be stated, the same in both cases, except perhaps one question in the Reed Case not in this case. Inasmuch as the Reed Case has been affirmed, it would serve no practical purpose to write an extended opinion in this case. Upon the authority of that case the judgment herein will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cutbirth v. State, 183 S.W. 1198 (Tex. 1916).

183 S.W. 1198 (Cutbirth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. State
183 S.W. 1168 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)