Custom Topsoil, Inc. v. City of Buffalo
63 A.D.3d 1512, 879 N.Y.S.2d 749
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Custom Topsoil, Inc. v. City of Buffalo. Read the opinion of the Court — 63 A.D.3d 1511 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 2009·No. Appeal No. 3·Published
Opinion
—Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered May 12, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order, among other things, granted the motion of petitioners/plaintiffs for leave to renew. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984 [1994]). Present—Scudder, PJ., Smith, Peradotto, Garni and Green, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Custom Topsoil, Inc. v. City of Buffalo, 63 A.D.3d 1512, 879 N.Y.S.2d 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
63 A.D.3d 1512 (Custom Topsoil, Inc. v. City of Buffalo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ciesinski v. Town of Aurora
202 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)