Custom Farm Services of Alabama, Inc. v. Foshee
344 So. 2d 1214, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 2094
Opinions
The record designated by the appellant did not include a transcript of the evidence, and it fails to show whether the trial court found that the credit arrangement between the parties was an “open end credit plan,” as those terms are defined in Alabama’s Mini-Code. Title 5, § 316(e), Code.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Custom Farm Services of Alabama, Inc. v. Foshee, 344 So. 2d 1214, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 2094 (Ala. 1977).
344 So. 2d 1214 (Custom Farm Services of Alabama, Inc. v. Foshee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.