Custer v. Tompkins County Bank
9 Pa. 27
Opinion
This cause is ruled by The Bank of Pittsburgh v. Whitehead. The rule laid down there, is, that notice to a corporator is not notice to the corporation, unless he were constituted an organ of communication between it and those who deal with it. The corporator, in this case, was not such an organ, and the evidence was properly rejected.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Custer v. Tompkins County Bank, 9 Pa. 27 (Pa. 1848).
9 Pa. 27 (Custer v. Tompkins County Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joseph A. Puleo & Sons, Inc. v. Borough Council
298 A.2d 658 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)