Custer v. Fortuna Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Custer v. Fortuna Oil Co.

1919 OK 306, 187 P. 248, 77 Okla. 257, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 281

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 28, 1919

Docket9055 and 10096

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK 306 (Custer v. Fortuna Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Custer v. Fortuna Oil Co., 1919 OK 306, 187 P. 248, 77 Okla. 257, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 281 (Okla. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

RAINEY, J.

The facts in this ease are substantially the same as in the case of Charles M. Prowant et al. v. John Sealy et al., Trustees for Magnolia Petroleum Company, this day decided and the legal propositions involved are identical. The opinion in the' last named case, therefore, governs this ease and requires an affirmance of the judgment of the trial court.

It is so ordered.

OWEN, O. J., KANE, PITOHFORD, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, J.T., concur; MeNEILL, J., dissents; HARRISON, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RAINEY, J.

The facts in this ease are substantially the same as in the case of Charles M. Prowant et al. v. John Sealy et al., Trustees for Magnolia Petroleum Company, this day decided and the legal propositions involved are identical. The opinion in the' last named case, therefore, governs this ease and requires an affirmance of the judgment of the trial court.

It is so ordered.

OWEN, O. J., KANE, PITOHFORD, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, J.T., concur; MeNEILL, J., dissents; HARRISON, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK 306, 187 P. 248, 77 Okla. 257, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/custer-v-fortuna-oil-co-okla-1919.