Cushnie v. Nago
This text of Cushnie v. Nago (Cushnie v. Nago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX 07-JAN-2025 10:42 AM Dkt. 51 ODMR
SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
RALPH S. CUSHNIE and more than THIRTY VOTERS, Plaintiffs,
vs.
SCOTT NAGO, as Chief Elections Officer for the Office of Elections, State of Hawaiʻi; and JADE FOUNTAIN-TANIGAWA, County Clerk for the County of Kauaʻi, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
On December 29, 2024, Plaintiffs filed an “Opposition to
Judgment Pursuant to Constitution of the State of Hawaii,
Article I Section I” and a “Layman Executive Summary.” The
deadline to timely file a motion for reconsideration from this
court’s December 20, 2024 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law,
and Judgment was December 30, 2024. See Hawaiʻi Rules of
Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 40(a) (eff. 2000). We construe
both documents filed on December 29, 2024, collectively as a
motion for reconsideration. Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration filed
on December 29, 2024, and the record, this court has not
overlooked or misapprehended points of law or fact. See HRAP
Rule 40(b).
It is ordered that the motion is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, January 7, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cushnie v. Nago, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cushnie-v-nago-haw-2025.