Cushnie v. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service
This text of 277 F. Supp. 748 (Cushnie v. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petitioner, an inmate in a state penal institution, has filed a “Petition For a Declaratory Judgment” challenging the validity of a deportation order allegedly entered against him on October 4, 1965. Petitioner challenges the order on the ground that he was never served with a show cause order, that he was never afforded counsel nor advised of his right to counsel, and that the criminal conviction which apparently formed the basis of the order is not yet final and should not have been regarded as such.
Petitioner had a right to appeal from the original order within six months from the date of entry. 8 U.S.C.A. § 1105a (a) (1). Whether he did so or not is not revealed in his petition, nor is it disclosed whether he has exhausted the various available administrative remedies. But these defects are of no present concern, since this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the action. The Court of Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction of such cases. 8 U.S.C.A. § 1105a. Mavronas v. Ryan, 227 F.Supp. 944 (D.Conn. 1963).
Therefore, petitioner’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 F. Supp. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cushnie-v-commissioner-immigration-naturalization-service-paed-1968.