Cushman v. Physical Rehabilitation Network, LLC
This text of Cushman v. Physical Rehabilitation Network, LLC (Cushman v. Physical Rehabilitation Network, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ol}
a 3 FILED 5 MAY 15 2024 6 CLERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 BY DEPUTY 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 |} ANTHONY CUSHMAN, individually Case No.: 3:23-cv-01798-BEN-DDL and on behalf of others similarly situated; CLASS ACTION and MARITZA HERNANDEZ, 13 || individually and on behalf of other ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL 14 similarly situated, BRIEFING 5 Plaintiffs, 16 7 PHYSICAL REHABILITATION NETWORK, LLC, a Delaware limited 18 || liability company; HEALTHCARE 19 EMPLOYEE SERVICES, LLC, a California limited liability company; and 20 || DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 51 Defendants.
3 Federal courts have limited jurisdictional power and have a continuing duty to confirm their subject matter jurisdiction. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env't, 523 5 U.S. 83, 94 (1998). A district court has “an independent obligation to determine that 6 subject matter jurisdiction exists.” Serrano v. 180 Connect, Inc., 478 F.3d 1018, 1021 17 (9th Cir. 2007). 28
Accordingly, in connection with the Plaintiffs’ motion for remand, the Court 2 ||hereby ORDERS the parties to submit additional briefing on the following issues: 3 1. The location of the principal place of business of Defendant Physical 4 || Rehabilitation Network, LLC; and 5 2. The location of the principal place of business of Defendant Healthcare 6 ||Employee Services, LLC. 7 The parties shall each file a single opening brief on the issues above no later than 8 ||Friday, May 31, 2024. The briefs shall not exceed five (5) pages (excluding any 9 evidentiary attachments). The parties may file an opposition brief no later than Friday, 10 ||June 7, 2024. The opposition briefs shall not exceed five (5) pages (excluding any 11 evidentiary attachments). There shall be no reply briefing. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. f\ = 14 Dated: May 15, 2024 15 . ROGER T. BENITEZ United States District Judge
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cushman v. Physical Rehabilitation Network, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cushman-v-physical-rehabilitation-network-llc-casd-2024.