Cushing v. Cushing

61 N.E. 814, 180 Mass. 150, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 748
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 26, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 N.E. 814 (Cushing v. Cushing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cushing v. Cushing, 61 N.E. 814, 180 Mass. 150, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 748 (Mass. 1901).

Opinion

Loring, J.

In this case the two counts were for separate causes of action. In such a case, the election of the libellee, to rest his case on one count upon the evidence introduced by the libellant, closes the case on that count; after that has been done the libellant has no right to put in any evidence on that case, unless the court in its discretion allows it to be reopened. The continuance of the trial on the other count does not enlarge or affect the libellant’s right to put in evidence on the case that has been closed.

It is not necessary to consider whether the libellee in such a case has a right to rest on one count and go into evidence on the other count; if that is a matter within the discretion of the court, it is enough that in this case the court exercised its discretion in favor of the libellee.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finnegan v. Checker Taxi Co.
14 N.E.2d 127 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 N.E. 814, 180 Mass. 150, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cushing-v-cushing-mass-1901.