Cushing-Gale v. Kelly

155 A.D.2d 996, 549 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14926
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 155 A.D.2d 996 (Cushing-Gale v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cushing-Gale v. Kelly, 155 A.D.2d 996, 549 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Having failed to raise the issue on his administrative appeal, petitioner cannot, in this article 78 proceeding, contend that the determination should be reversed because he was denied the right to call a witness (see, Matter of Samuels v Kelly, 143 AD2d 506, lv denied 73 NY2d 707). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Morton, J.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Budget Tire Center, Inc. v. Jackson
235 A.D.2d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Davis v. Richardson
167 A.D.2d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A.D.2d 996, 549 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cushing-gale-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1989.