Curzio v. Tancredi

8 A.D.3d 608, 778 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9162
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 2004·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Lebowitz, J.), dated August 8, 2003, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To prove a prima facie case of negligence in a slip-and-fall case, a plaintiff is required to show that the defendant created the condition which caused the accident or that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the condition (see Luciani v Waldbaum, Inc., 304 AD2d 537 [2003]; Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc., 248 AD2d 436 [1998]). Accordingly, on the defendant’s motion, he was required to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment by establishing that he neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the condition (see Luciani v Waldbaum, Inc., supra). The evidence submitted by the defendant in the form of the parties’ testimony at their examinations before trial failed to establish that the defendant did not create the condition. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt, Cozier and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curzio v. Tancredi, 8 A.D.3d 608, 778 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

8 A.D.3d 608 (Curzio v. Tancredi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera v. Queens Ballpark Co., LLC
134 A.D.3d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Feldmus v. Ryan Food Corp.
29 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Mitchell v. Consolidated Edison
27 A.D.3d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Galit v. Town of Islip
19 A.D.3d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Joachim v. 1824 Church Avenue, Inc.
12 A.D.3d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)