Curto v. Diehl

38 N.E.3d 806, 26 N.Y.3d 946, 2015 NY Slip Op 83311, 17 N.Y.S.3d 63, 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 2569
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 3, 2015
StatusPublished

This text of 38 N.E.3d 806 (Curto v. Diehl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curto v. Diehl, 38 N.E.3d 806, 26 N.Y.3d 946, 2015 NY Slip Op 83311, 17 N.Y.S.3d 63, 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 2569 (N.Y. 2015).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Fahey taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 N.E.3d 806, 26 N.Y.3d 946, 2015 NY Slip Op 83311, 17 N.Y.S.3d 63, 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 2569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curto-v-diehl-ny-2015.