Curtiz J. v. Tanisha R.B. (In re Tamel D. Admin. for Children's Servs.)
96 N.E.3d 222, 73 N.Y.S.3d 126, 31 N.Y.3d 949
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided April 3, 2018·No. 2018–124·Published
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curtiz J. v. Tanisha R.B. (In re Tamel D. Admin. for Children's Servs.), 96 N.E.3d 222, 73 N.Y.S.3d 126, 31 N.Y.3d 949 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).
96 N.E.3d 222 (Curtiz J. v. Tanisha R.B. (In re Tamel D. Admin. for Children's Servs.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.