Curtiss v. Moore
This text of 20 Jones & S. 532 (Curtiss v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court at General Term (after stating the facts as above), said:—“It was not error to exclude this testimony (§ 829, Code; Alexander v. Dutcher, 70 N. Y. 385 ; Church v. Howard, 79 Ib. 415). . .The defendant offered in evidence the note which he claimed was the note to take up which the note in suit had been given. This was excluded as immaterial, and the defendant excepted. As their evidence then stood and now stands, this note had no bearing on the case. It was not error to exclude it.”
Opinion by Truax, J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J., concurred.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Jones & S. 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtiss-v-moore-nysuperctnyc-1885.