Curtiss v. Engle
2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 29, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 502
This text of 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 29 (Curtiss v. Engle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Curtiss v. Engle, 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 29, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 502 (N.Y. 1842).
Opinion
Appeal from order of vice chancellor of the first circuit, denying motion to open proofs, &c.
Order affirmed with costs, and proceedings remitted.
Same v. The Same. Appeal from a decision of the vice chancellor of the first circuit refusing to dissolve injunction.
Order affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 29, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtiss-v-engle-nychanct-1842.