Curtiss v. . Curtiss

113 N.E. 1053, 218 N.Y. 680, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1180
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 23, 1916·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., His cook, Collin, Ouddeback, Hogan, Seabury and Pound, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtiss v. . Curtiss, 113 N.E. 1053, 218 N.Y. 680, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1180 (N.Y. 1916).

113 N.E. 1053 (Curtiss v. . Curtiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.