Curtiss v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 269, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2322
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided July 20, 1926·No. Docket No. 2327.·Published

Opinion

[270] OIUNION.

Tram:mell:

This proceeding involves the same question which was presented in the Appeal of Morgan J. McMichael, 4 B. T. A. 266.

Order of redetérmination will he entered on 10 days’ notice under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtiss v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 269, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2322 (bta 1926).

4 B.T.A. 269 (Curtiss v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appeal of Curtiss
4 B.T.A. 269 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)