Curtiss v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 269, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2322
Opinion
[270] OIUNION.
This proceeding involves the same question which was presented in the Appeal of Morgan J. McMichael, 4 B. T. A. 266.
Order of redetérmination will he entered on 10 days’ notice under Rule 50.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curtiss v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 269, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2322 (bta 1926).
4 B.T.A. 269 (Curtiss v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Appeal of Curtiss
4 B.T.A. 269 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)