Home/Board of Tax Appeals/Curtiss v. Commissioner

Curtiss v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 269, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2322
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJuly 20, 1926
DocketDocket No. 2327.
StatusPublished

This text of 4 B.T.A. 269 (Curtiss v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtiss v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 269, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2322 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[270]*270OIUNION.

Tram:mell:

This proceeding involves the same question which was presented in the Appeal of Morgan J. McMichael, 4 B. T. A. 266.

Order of redetérmination will he entered on 10 days’ notice under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of Curtiss
4 B.T.A. 269 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 B.T.A. 269, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtiss-v-commissioner-bta-1926.