Curtiss-Manes-Schulte, Inc.
This text of Curtiss-Manes-Schulte, Inc. (Curtiss-Manes-Schulte, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of -- ) ) Curtiss-Manes-Schulte, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 59362 ) Under Contract No. W911S7-13-C-0018 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Daniel Schulte President
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. Army Chief Trial Attorney CPT Tyler L. Davidson, JA Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE YOUNGER ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT
In this deemed appeal regarding a construction contract, appellant Curtiss-Manes- Schulte, Inc., (appellant) seeks recovery for the alleged cost of storing materials on site. Appellant elected disposition under our Rule 12.2.
The record contains an uncontroverted representation by government counsel that, by date of 25 June 2014, after the filing of the appeal, the government paid appellant the full amount of the principal in dispute (Bd. corr. ltr. dtd. 30 July 2014 at 1). In addition, the government has submitted Modification No. P00003 dated 29 July 2014, increasing the contract price-by $287.24, which is said to represent Contract Disputes Act interest for the 57-day period from the date of claim submission to the date of payment (Bd. corr. ltr. dtd. 30 July 2014, attachment).
Accordingly, by order dated 26 August 2014, the Board directed appellant to show cause, by or before 18 September 2014, why the appeal should not be dismissed as moot. Appellant has failed to respond or otherwise comply with the order.
Given the uncontroverted recitations of payment of principal and interest in dispute, the Board sees no reason to maintain this appeal on its docket. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice as moot.
Dated: 10 October 2014
ALEXANDER YO Administrative Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59362, Appeal of Curtis-Manes-Schulte, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curtiss-Manes-Schulte, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtiss-manes-schulte-inc-asbca-2014.