Curtis v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curtis v. Wilson

263 A.D. 906, 32 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7320

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 906 (Curtis v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. Wilson, 263 A.D. 906, 32 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner appeals from an order denying his application for an order in the nature of mandamus to compel respondents to perform certain acts alleged to be required of them under the Prison Law. In brief, petitioner claims that he has served all of the time for which he is legally liable and that he is now entitled to be released. This matter has been in this court before upon precisely the same state of facts (254 App. Div. 714). It was there determined that petitioner’s earliest possible date of release would be February 9, 1943. Petitioner has advanced nothing substantially new on this application by way of fact or other[907]*907wise. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner appeals from an order denying his application for an order in the nature of mandamus to compel respondents to perform certain acts alleged to be required of them under the Prison Law. In brief, petitioner claims that he has served all of the time for which he is legally liable and that he is now entitled to be released. This matter has been in this court before upon precisely the same state of facts (254 App. Div. 714). It was there determined that petitioner’s earliest possible date of release would be February 9, 1943. Petitioner has advanced nothing substantially new on this application by way of fact or other[907]*907wise. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 906, 32 N.Y.S.2d 95, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-wilson-nyappdiv-1942.