Curtis v. Treasury Department

Ninth Circuit

Curtis v. Treasury Department

324 F. App'x 629

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 2009

DocketNo. 07-17017

StatusPublished

This text of 324 F. App'x 629 (Curtis v. Treasury Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. Treasury Department, 324 F. App'x 629 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Robert Curtis appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) action alleging fraud and numerous other claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, Alvarado v. Table Mt. Rancheria, 509 F.3d 1008, 1015 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.

[630]*630The district court properly dismissed Curtis’s FTCA action because, as Curtis concedes in his opening brief, he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See id. at 1018-19 (explaining that the timely filing of an administrative claim is a jurisdictional prerequisite to a suit under the FTCA).

Curtis’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We deny Curtis’s February 17, 2009, Motion to Stay Pending Disposition of Motion.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI