Curtis v. Thomson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curtis v. Thomson

248 A.D. 554

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Curtis v. Thomson. Read the opinion of the Court — 253 A.D. 806 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Appeal from so much of order as denies plaintiff’s motion to

strike out the second separate and distinct defense and the fifth separate and distinct partial defense, as insufficient in law, and for other relief. Order, so far [555]*555as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from so much of order as denies plaintiff’s motion to

strike out the second separate and distinct defense and the fifth separate and distinct partial defense, as insufficient in law, and for other relief. Order, so far [555]*555as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion.

Curtis v. Thomson, 248 A.D. 554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 554 (Curtis v. Thomson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.