Curtis v. Thomson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Curtis v. Thomson

248 A.D. 554

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 554 (Curtis v. Thomson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. Thomson, 248 A.D. 554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from so much of order as denies plaintiff’s motion to

strike out the second separate and distinct defense and the fifth separate and distinct partial defense, as insufficient in law, and for other relief. Order, so far [555]*555as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from so much of order as denies plaintiff’s motion to

strike out the second separate and distinct defense and the fifth separate and distinct partial defense, as insufficient in law, and for other relief. Order, so far [555]*555as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-thomson-nyappdiv-1936.