Curtis v. Stephens

864 S.W.2d 492, 37 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 122, 1993 Tex. LEXIS 134, 1993 WL 473297
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 17, 1993
DocketNo. D-3999
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 864 S.W.2d 492 (Curtis v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis v. Stephens, 864 S.W.2d 492, 37 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 122, 1993 Tex. LEXIS 134, 1993 WL 473297 (Tex. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

C. Blake Stephens and Virgil Morgan were the directors, officers and shareholders of Arlington Datsun, Inc., a business against whom Jimmy Curtis brought a contract action in 1983. Stephens and Morgan did not notify Curtis of their voluntary dissolution of Arlington Datsun in September 1984, as required by statute,1 and continued to defend the dissolved business under the corporate name. Curtis claims that he was unaware of Arlington Datsun’s dissolution until after he obtained a final judgment against it in 1988. When the judgment was not satisfied, he filed an action to trace Arlington Datsun’s assets against Stephens and Morgan in their capacity as directors and shareholders.

Stephens and Morgan obtained a summary judgment on the grounds that Article 7.12 of the Texas Business Corporation Act barred this suit.2 The court of appeals held that the limitations period did not begin to run until Curtis discovered or should have discovered that Arlington Datsun intended to dissolve. 858 S.W.2d 822, 825.3 The appellate court reversed and remanded to the trial court for a determination of the factual dispute concerning this matter.

In denying this application for writ of error, we neither approve nor disapprove of the decision of court of appeals to apply the discovery rule in such situations as an alternative to strict enforcement of Article 6.04 of the Texas Business Corporation Act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Texas Woman's Hospital, Inc.
930 S.W.2d 717 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
864 S.W.2d 492, 37 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 122, 1993 Tex. LEXIS 134, 1993 WL 473297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-stephens-tex-1993.