Curtis v. State

248 S.W. 362, 93 Tex. Crim. 448, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 414
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 21, 1923
DocketNo. 7436.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 248 S.W. 362 (Curtis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis v. State, 248 S.W. 362, 93 Tex. Crim. 448, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 414 (Tex. 1923).

Opinions

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Polk County of robbery, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary.

The State moves to dismiss the appeal because of a defective caption in the transcript. Said caption is as follows:

"The State of Texas, County of Polk.

At a term of the District Court, begun and holden within and for the County of Polk, at Livingston on the _____ day of _____ A.D. 1922, the Hon. J.L. Manry, judge thereof, presiding, the following cause came on for trial, to-wit:

The State of Texas No. 5242 vs. Jim Curtis."
It is manifest from this that the date of the beginning and ending of the trial term is not set forth, and the State is thus deprived of any power to ascertain whether the statement of facts, etc., were filed within the term. The State's motion is well taken, and the appeal is dismissed. Loving v. State, opinion handed down October 4, 1922.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO RE-INSTATE APPEAL.
February 21, 1923.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noble v. State
18 S.W.2d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 S.W. 362, 93 Tex. Crim. 448, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-state-texcrimapp-1923.