Curtis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Curtis v. State

356 S.W.3d 179, 2011 WL 2237017

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 2012·No. ED 94589·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the judgment entered after a jury verdict for plaintiff for an action alleging a dangerous condition at a psychiatric center. The State of Missouri argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for directed verdict and motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial based on sovereign immunity. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the judgment entered after a jury verdict for plaintiff for an action alleging a dangerous condition at a psychiatric center. The State of Missouri argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for directed verdict and motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial based on sovereign immunity. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Curtis v. State, 356 S.W.3d 179, 2011 WL 2237017 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

356 S.W.3d 179 (Curtis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related