Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Curtis v. State

Curtis v. State

356 S.W.3d 179, 2011 WL 2237017
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 3, 2012
DocketED 94589
StatusPublished

This text of 356 S.W.3d 179 (Curtis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis v. State, 356 S.W.3d 179, 2011 WL 2237017 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals from the judgment entered after a jury verdict for plaintiff for an action alleging a dangerous condition at a psychiatric center. The State of Missouri argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for directed verdict and motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial based on sovereign immunity. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. State
356 S.W.3d 179 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 S.W.3d 179, 2011 WL 2237017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-state-moctapp-2012.