Curtis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Curtis v. State

128 S.E. 591, 34 Ga. App. 142, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 82

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 9, 1925

Docket16383

StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 591 (Curtis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. State, 128 S.E. 591, 34 Ga. App. 142, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 82 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction, the conviction has the approval of the trial judge, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial is meritorious. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorth, J., concur. W. O. Cooper Jr., II. B. Bell, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction, the conviction has the approval of the trial judge, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial is meritorious. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorth, J., concur. W. O. Cooper Jr., II. B. Bell, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 S.E. 591, 34 Ga. App. 142, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-state-gactapp-1925.