Curtis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Curtis v. State

728 So. 2d 322, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2162, 1999 WL 95077

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Curtis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 748 So. 2d 370 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1999·No. No. 97-04956·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John F. Curtis appeals the restitution order entered following an evidentiary hearing. He argues, the State concedes, and we agree, that the State failed to meet its burden of proof in establishing the amount of loss suffered by the victim. Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for a new restitution hearing.

Restitution order reversed; remanded for new restitution hearing.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John F. Curtis appeals the restitution order entered following an evidentiary hearing. He argues, the State concedes, and we agree, that the State failed to meet its burden of proof in establishing the amount of loss suffered by the victim. Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for a new restitution hearing.

Restitution order reversed; remanded for new restitution hearing.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.

Curtis v. State, 728 So. 2d 322, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2162, 1999 WL 95077 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

728 So. 2d 322 (Curtis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.