Curtis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Curtis v. State

728 So. 2d 322, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2162, 1999 WL 95077

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 1999

DocketNo. 97-04956

StatusPublished

This text of 728 So. 2d 322 (Curtis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. State, 728 So. 2d 322, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2162, 1999 WL 95077 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John F. Curtis appeals the restitution order entered following an evidentiary hearing. He argues, the State concedes, and we agree, that the State failed to meet its burden of proof in establishing the amount of loss suffered by the victim. Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for a new restitution hearing.

Restitution order reversed; remanded for new restitution hearing.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John F. Curtis appeals the restitution order entered following an evidentiary hearing. He argues, the State concedes, and we agree, that the State failed to meet its burden of proof in establishing the amount of loss suffered by the victim. Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for a new restitution hearing.

Restitution order reversed; remanded for new restitution hearing.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

728 So. 2d 322, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2162, 1999 WL 95077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.