Curtis v. State

657 So. 2d 83, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7707, 1995 WL 421252
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 1995
DocketNo. 95-1557
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 657 So. 2d 83 (Curtis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis v. State, 657 So. 2d 83, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7707, 1995 WL 421252 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

FARMER, Judge.

We reverse for the trial court either to attach those portions of the record conclusively refuting defendant’s claims in his rule 3.850 motion or for an evidentiary hearing on those claims.

GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Viyella Co. v. Gomes
657 So. 2d 83 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 So. 2d 83, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7707, 1995 WL 421252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.