Curtis v. Sargent Construction Inc.
595 So. 2d 258, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2653, 1992 WL 43288
This text of 595 So. 2d 258 (Curtis v. Sargent Construction Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Curtis v. Sargent Construction Inc., 595 So. 2d 258, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2653, 1992 WL 43288 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
We affirm on the main appeal and reverse on the cross-appeal. Appellee, seller, is entitled to attorney’s fees to the extent that it prevailed on its claim that it was entitled to retain appellant’s deposit as liquidated damages. See Blue Lakes Apartments, Ltd. v. George Gowing, Inc., 464 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
BLUE LAKES APT. v. George Gowing, Inc.
464 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
595 So. 2d 258, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2653, 1992 WL 43288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-sargent-construction-inc-fladistctapp-1992.