Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Curtis v. Sargent Construction Inc.

Curtis v. Sargent Construction Inc.

595 So. 2d 258, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2653, 1992 WL 43288
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1992·No. No. 91-1260·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the main appeal and reverse on the cross-appeal. Appellee, seller, is entitled to attorney’s fees to the extent that it prevailed on its claim that it was entitled to retain appellant’s deposit as liquidated damages. See Blue Lakes Apartments, Ltd. v. George Gowing, Inc., 464 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis v. Sargent Construction Inc., 595 So. 2d 258, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2653, 1992 WL 43288 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 258 (Curtis v. Sargent Construction Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BLUE LAKES APT. v. George Gowing, Inc.
464 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)