Curtis v. Pomeroy

132 A.D. 938

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs against the defendant town. , All concurred, except Kellogg, J., dissenting; Sewell, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis v. Pomeroy, 132 A.D. 938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

132 A.D. 938 (Curtis v. Pomeroy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.