Curtis v. Oriole Homes Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Curtis v. Oriole Homes Corp.

453 So. 2d 551, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1723, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14618

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 8, 1984

DocketNo. 83-2377

StatusPublished

This text of 453 So. 2d 551 (Curtis v. Oriole Homes Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. Oriole Homes Corp., 453 So. 2d 551, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1723, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14618 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat this as a petition for certiorari. Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c); Pridgen v. Board of County Commissioners, 389 So.2d 259 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

The trial court erred in dismissing the complaint as to the multiple plaintiffs leaving only plaintiff, Rose Ellen Scuilla. The addition of parties should have been permitted under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.250(c). See, also, Fed.R.Civ.P. 20(a) and Condominium Owners Organization of Century Village East, Inc. v. Century Village East, Inc., 428 So.2d 384 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

We grant certiorari and quash the Order Granting Motion to Strike dated October 25, 1983.

Certiorari granted.

HERSEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI