Curtis v. Nixon

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Curtis v. Nixon

104 A. 894, 117 Me. 566, 1918 Me. LEXIS 127

DecidedSeptember 7, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A. 894 (Curtis v. Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. Nixon, 104 A. 894, 117 Me. 566, 1918 Me. LEXIS 127 (Me. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff recovered a verdict of $406.33 for damages sustained in an automobile collision. The issue was legal liability on the part of the defendant. As is usual in this class of cases the testimony was sharply contradictory. The jury sustained the plaintiff's contentions, and the evidence abundantly justifies the verdict. The responsibility was placed, where it belongs, on the defendant. Motion denied. Andrews & Nelson, for plaintiff. Harvey D. Eaton, and Frank O. Dean, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff recovered a verdict of $406.33 for damages sustained in an automobile collision. The issue was legal liability on the part of the defendant. As is usual in this class of cases the testimony was sharply contradictory. The jury sustained the plaintiff's contentions, and the evidence abundantly justifies the verdict. The responsibility was placed, where it belongs, on the defendant. Motion denied. Andrews & Nelson, for plaintiff. Harvey D. Eaton, and Frank O. Dean, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A. 894, 117 Me. 566, 1918 Me. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-nixon-me-1918.