Curtis v. Neumark
249 A.D. 923, 293 N.Y.S. 501, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10170
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action on a promissory note.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Cunningham, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curtis v. Neumark, 249 A.D. 923, 293 N.Y.S. 501, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10170 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
249 A.D. 923 (Curtis v. Neumark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.