Curtis v. Neumark

249 A.D. 923, 293 N.Y.S. 501, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10170

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action on a promissory note.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Cunningham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis v. Neumark, 249 A.D. 923, 293 N.Y.S. 501, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10170 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

249 A.D. 923 (Curtis v. Neumark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.