Curtis v. Navajo Nation Bar Ass'n Admission Committee

Navajo Nation Ct. App.

Curtis v. Navajo Nation Bar Ass'n Admission Committee

3 Navajo Rptr. 53

CourtNavajo Nation Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 14, 1981

DocketNo. A-CV-08-81

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Navajo Rptr. 53 (Curtis v. Navajo Nation Bar Ass'n Admission Committee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navajo Nation Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. Navajo Nation Bar Ass'n Admission Committee, 3 Navajo Rptr. 53 (navajoctapp 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Order by the

Associate Justice Homer Bluehouse.

The Honorable Chief Justice Nelson J. McCabe has disqualified himself from acting upon the petition for a writ of mandamus and has appointed the undersigned Associate Justice to make any necessary orders in this matter. The petition was filed upon February 27, 1981 and it appears that James Woodrow Curtis has actually taken the examination for admission to the Bar of the Navajo Nation. That being the case there is no need for this Court to take action on the petition or comment further on its merits or legal sufficiency.

The Court takes no position as to the apparent dispute between Mr. Curtis and the Navajo Nation Bar Association Admissions Committee because that dispute is being taken care of before the committee and the Court will defer to it for the present.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Order by the

Associate Justice Homer Bluehouse.

The Honorable Chief Justice Nelson J. McCabe has disqualified himself from acting upon the petition for a writ of mandamus and has appointed the undersigned Associate Justice to make any necessary orders in this matter. The petition was filed upon February 27, 1981 and it appears that James Woodrow Curtis has actually taken the examination for admission to the Bar of the Navajo Nation. That being the case there is no need for this Court to take action on the petition or comment further on its merits or legal sufficiency.

The Court takes no position as to the apparent dispute between Mr. Curtis and the Navajo Nation Bar Association Admissions Committee because that dispute is being taken care of before the committee and the Court will defer to it for the present.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Navajo Rptr. 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-navajo-nation-bar-assn-admission-committee-navajoctapp-1981.