Curtis v. Lowman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Curtis v. Lowman

32 N.W. 390, 71 Iowa 759

DecidedMarch 15, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.W. 390 (Curtis v. Lowman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. Lowman, 32 N.W. 390, 71 Iowa 759 (iowa 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Adams, Ch., J.

The defendant took a bill of sale of certain hotel fnrni-. [760]*760ture from one J. W. Fuson and Mary E. Fuson. The Fusóns at the time were indebted to the plaintiff, and she avers that defendants, in consideration of the conveyance to them of the hotel furniture, agreed to pay the Fusons’ debt to the plaintiff. The defendants denied that they made such agreement. The evidence in respect to-such agreement is in conflict. The action is at law, and we cannot disturb the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams, Ch., J.

The defendant took a bill of sale of certain hotel fnrni-. [760]*760ture from one J. W. Fuson and Mary E. Fuson. The Fusóns at the time were indebted to the plaintiff, and she avers that defendants, in consideration of the conveyance to them of the hotel furniture, agreed to pay the Fusons’ debt to the plaintiff. The defendants denied that they made such agreement. The evidence in respect to-such agreement is in conflict. The action is at law, and we cannot disturb the judgment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.W. 390, 71 Iowa 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-lowman-iowa-1887.