Curtis v. Laconia Car Co. Works

67 A. 220, 74 N.H. 600, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 2
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 4, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 67 A. 220 (Curtis v. Laconia Car Co. Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis v. Laconia Car Co. Works, 67 A. 220, 74 N.H. 600, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 2 (N.H. 1907).

Opinion

Chase, J.

The defendants’ exceptions to the denial of the motions for a nonsuit and for an order of judgment in their favor raise the same question of law that was before the court upon the former transfer of the case, and that was then decided adversely to them. Curtis v. Car Works, 73 N. H. 516. The exception to the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict on the ground that it is against the law and the evidence raises no question of law ( Wilbur v. Berry, 71 N. H. 619) and is not insisted upon. The exception to the denial of the motion to recall the jury and interrogate them as to the evidence which they considered in arriving at their verdict, etc., cannot be sustained. Winslow v. Smith, ante, 65; State v. Frazier, ante, 112.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Kenna
374 A.2d 427 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1977)
Caldwell v. Yeatman
15 A.2d 252 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 A. 220, 74 N.H. 600, 1907 N.H. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-laconia-car-co-works-nh-1907.