Curtis v. Jones
4 How. Pr. 182
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Curtis v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 How. App. Cas. 137 →
Opinion
This was an [183]*183action of replevin, in the detinet, in which the defendant avowed the detention of the property as a mechanic having a lien thereon for the manufacturing. And the question arose on demurrer, as to the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s plea in bar, setting up a special agreement between them in answer to said avowry. (Reported 3 Denio, 590.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curtis v. Jones, 4 How. Pr. 182 (N.Y. 1847).
4 How. Pr. 182 (Curtis v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Curtis v. Jones
3 Denio 590 (New York Court of Appeals, 1848)