Curtis v. Hobbs

2015 Ark. 127
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 19, 2015
DocketCV-14-1098
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2015 Ark. 127 (Curtis v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Curtis v. Hobbs, 2015 Ark. 127 (Ark. 2015).

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. 127

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-1098

DEMETRIUS CURTIS Opinion Delivered March 19, 2015 APPELLANT PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF V. CERTIORARI AND MOTION TO FILE A BELATED BRIEF [CHICOT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS NO. 09CV-14-72] DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION APPELLEE HONORABLE ROBERT BYNUM GIBSON, JUDGE

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION AND PETITION MOOT.

PER CURIAM

On October 15, 2014, appellant Demetrius Curtis filed a pro se petition for writ of

habeas corpus in the Chicot County Circuit Court where he was incarcerated. The circuit court

denied the petition, and appellant lodged an appeal from the order in this court. Now before

us are appellant’s petition for writ of certiorari and motion to file a belated brief.

Because the public records of the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) reflect that

appellant is no longer incarcerated, it is clear that he could not prevail on appeal were we to

permit the appeal to proceed. A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of

habeas corpus a prisoner not in custody. Branning v. Harmon, 2009 Ark. 533 (per curiam).

Accordingly, we find that the motion and petition are moot. Thus, we do not reach the merits

of the motion and petition and dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Damien Echols v. State of Arkansas
2024 Ark. 61 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 Ark. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-hobbs-ark-2015.