Curtis v. Fishkill Allsport Fitness & Racquetball Club, Inc.

2 A.D.3d 768, 769 N.Y.S.2d 411
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 2003·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Tolbert, J.), dated March 14, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion in limine to preclude him from introducing testimony of a certain nonparty witness at trial.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from is an evidentiary ruling. Such a ruling, even when made “in advance of trial on motion papers, constitutes, at best, an advisory opinion, which is neither appealable as of right nor by permission” (Chateau Rive Corp. v Enclave Dev. Assoc., 283 AD2d 537 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis v. Fishkill Allsport Fitness & Racquetball Club, Inc., 2 A.D.3d 768, 769 N.Y.S.2d 411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

2 A.D.3d 768 (Curtis v. Fishkill Allsport Fitness & Racquetball Club, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
2020 NY Slip Op 07154 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Finger v. 162 Grand St. Realty, LLC
2020 NY Slip Op 3098 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Diller Ex Rel. Trelles v. Munzer
141 A.D.3d 630 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Leon Petroleum, LLC v. Carl S. Levine & Associates, P.C.
122 A.D.3d 686 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Winograd v. Price
21 A.D.3d 956 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)