Curtis V. Emanuel v. State of Florida
This text of Curtis V. Emanuel v. State of Florida (Curtis V. Emanuel v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D21-1349 _____________________________
CURTIS V. EMANUEL,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
September 22, 2021
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as facially insufficient. Petitioner is warned that any future filings that this court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2019) (providing that “[a] prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal” is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections).
LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Curtis V. Emanuel, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Curtis V. Emanuel v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/curtis-v-emanuel-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.