Curtis v. Drumm

26 A.D.2d 760, 272 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3544
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 20, 1966·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum bv the Court. In these article 78 CPLR proceedings to review and annul determinations of the Town Board of the Town of Schodack denying their applications for the renewal of trailer camp permits, petitioners appeal from judgments of the Supreme Court at Special Term dismissing their petitions on the merits. It is clear that petitioners’ renewal applications were not filed on or before the first day of December next preceding the expiration [761]*761date of their permits as required by section 10 of the 1959 ordinance of the Town Board. The Town Board’s rejections of their applications for untimeliness of filing thus were not arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law and Special Term correctly so held. We have examined appellants’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Judgments, affirmed and interim stay vacated, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis v. Drumm, 26 A.D.2d 760, 272 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

26 A.D.2d 760 (Curtis v. Drumm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Post v. 120 East End Avenue Corp.
464 N.E.2d 125 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Clark v. Sheridan
99 A.D.2d 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)