Curtis v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 7, 2026·No. 1D2024-2321·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Nos. 1D2024-2321

1D2024-2322

(Consolidated for disposition)

MICHAEL C. CURTIS and B.D.M. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC,

Appellants,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES, AND MOBILE HOMES,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Thomas Campbell, Director.

January 7, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY, KELSEY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Luke Newman of Luke Newman, P.A., Tallahassee; Elias R Hilal of Law Office of Elias R. Hilal, P.A., Fort Lauderdale; William Nicholson Spicola of Komisar Spicola P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.

Brooke Elizabeth Adams, Chief Appellate Counsel, and Andrew Fier, General Counsel, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Tallahassee; Alvan Balent, Jr., Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Curtis v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes (Curtis v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.