Curtis v. Curtis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Curtis v. Curtis

248 So. 2d 204, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6486

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 19, 1971

DocketNo. 70-700

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 So. 2d 204 (Curtis v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Curtis v. Curtis, 248 So. 2d 204, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6486 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant and appellee were divorced in the Circuit Court for Polk County. Temporary custody of the three minor children of the parties was awarded to Mr. Curtis, and Mrs. Curtis was denied any special equity in Mr. Curtis’ property. Mrs. Curtis appeals from the order awarding custody and denying her a special equity, and Mr. Curtis cross-appeals from the ruling ordering him to pay attorneys’ fees, alleging the fees are excessive.

We recognize the general rule in Florida that the mother is normally preferred as custodian of young children. Kelly v. Kelly, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 498. However, this does not mean that the mother is always awarded custody. When, as in this case, the chancellor after hearing the evidence awards custody to the father, and the record supports that decision, this court will not interfere. We note that this is a temporary custody order and therefore subject to modification at a later date.

As to the remaining points on appeal, the record shows that Mrs. Curtis failed to demonstrate a special equity in Mr. Curtis’ property, and the attorneys’ fees while high are not excessive.

The chancellor did not abuse his discretion in this case, and the judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI