Curtis v. Curtis

173 A.2d 140, 148 Conn. 733
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 11, 1961·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment rendered by the Superior Court when she failed to plead over after a demurrer to her complaint was sustained. She sought to have a Nevada decree of divorce made a judgment of the Superior Court and to enforce the payment of the support and maintenance allegedly incorporated in that decree. The court held that the pertinent provisions of a separation agreement between the parties was not made a part of the Nevada decree and that the plaintiff was not entitled to equitable relief. The court, in its memorandum of decision bn the demurrer, fully covered the issues in the matter and reached a correct result. Curtis v. Cur[734]*734tis, 22 Conn. Sup. 349, 173 A.2d 137. A detailed opinion by us is unnecessary.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis v. Curtis, 173 A.2d 140, 148 Conn. 733 (Colo. 1961).

173 A.2d 140 (Curtis v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donner v. Donner
302 So. 2d 452 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Luton v. Luton
472 S.W.2d 40 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1971)
Ballin v. Ballin
371 P.2d 32 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1962)