Curtis v. Cuccinelli

Fourth Circuit

Curtis v. Cuccinelli

534 F. App'x 219

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2013·No. No. 13-6437·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek Curtis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Curtis v. Cuccinelli, No. 1:12-cv-00296-CMH-IDD, 2013 WL 653287 (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 19 & entered Feb. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [220] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek Curtis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Curtis v. Cuccinelli, No. 1:12-cv-00296-CMH-IDD, 2013 WL 653287 (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 19 & entered Feb. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [220] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Curtis v. Cuccinelli, 534 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

534 F. App'x 219 (Curtis v. Cuccinelli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related