Curtis v. Cornish
85 A. 1134, 109 Me. 573, 1912 Me. LEXIS 166
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Curtis v. Cornish. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 Me. 384 →
Opinion
Upon the authority of Curtis v. Cornish, 109 Maine, 84, Atlantic Reporter, 799, the entry must be Exceptions sustained. B. W. Freeman, for Oakley C. Curtis et als, Petr’s. Fred V. Matthews, for et als.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Curtis v. Cornish, 85 A. 1134, 109 Me. 573, 1912 Me. LEXIS 166 (Me. 1912).
85 A. 1134 (Curtis v. Cornish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.