Curtis v. Coleman

443 N.E.2d 890, 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 2511
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided January 12, 1983·No. 1-1082A309·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue raised in this interlocutory appeal is whether a maternal grandmother can obtain court ordered visitation rights *891 with her granddaughter pursuant to the provisions of Ind.Code 31-1-11.7-2. Under the facts of this case, we hold that she cannot.

The statute permits the court to order grandparent visitation in two instances; one where a parent is deceased and the other being where the parent’s marriage has been dissolved. Neither situation exists here.

As Judge Neal recently stated in the case of In Re: The Visitation of J.O., (1982) Ind.App., 441 N.E.2d 991:

As a court, we are constrained to uphold the plain meaning of the statute and to carry out the true intent of the legislature. . Thompson v. Thompson, (1972) 259 Ind. 266, 286 N.E.2d 657; In the Matter of the Estate of Wisely, (1980) Ind.App., 402 N-E.2d 14. We hold that the Grandparent’s Visitation Statute limits third-party grandparents seeking visitation rights to the above-described two instances, ...

The trial court erred in setting aside its ruling on summary judgment.

Judgment reversed.

RATLIFF and NEAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curtis v. Coleman, 443 N.E.2d 890, 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 2511 (Ind. Ct. App. 1983).

443 N.E.2d 890 (Curtis v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. King
828 S.W.2d 630 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1992)
Cantu v. Cantu
562 N.E.2d 768 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1990)
Matter of Guardianship of Green
525 N.E.2d 634 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1988)
Tinsley v. Plummer
519 N.E.2d 752 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1988)
In Re Morris
494 So. 2d 87 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1986)